31 Comments
User's avatar
Mel's avatar

It would be interesting to map out these rules as they apply to proud boys, or turning point or other right wing groups and let them stew on how unpopular that would be.

Linda Baldassare's avatar

Thanks Shane , isn’t it amazing how they kept this old document but new ones have to be renewed yearly or five years , I was arrested in the 60s protests and labeled an ANARCHIC, lol ! Now I think they would beat me to death , well I will be in the No Kings protest so let’s see what happens , Thanks again for your article , very informative

Melissa's avatar

Linda: the files were assembled under the "secret" designation (courtesy, I believe, of the McCarthy '50s) "Premature Antifascists". What tangled webs we weave... .

Linda Baldassare's avatar

For sure ! Thank you !

Lawrence Necheles's avatar

It’s unenforceable. It’s Constitutionally vague and over broad. Go to any federal or local court house or municipal hearing room on any given day and observe the criminal courtrooms. What is being prosecuted? An actual, physical crime that’s on the books. The Judge requires, absent a guilty plea, the prosecutor to prove the “elements” of the crime.

What crime does this “order” describe? What does a prosecutor prove up? Nothing. It’s all “smoke and mirrors.” It’s a baffle them with bullshit deal.

Shane Yirak's avatar

You are counting on judges having a spine. Look at SCOTUS. I wish we could count on people doing the right thing in regards to the law.

Charmaine Webb's avatar

There are judges with spines. Three with SCOTUS. I know not in the majority, but their dissents are needed. We cannot forget the judges like Breyer in San Francisco and Young in Boston. Young's 161-page ruling he put out about the first amendment should be read by all Americans. Of course, we cannot and should not forget a judge with the best name ever, Sparkle Sooknanan. What she did to get those children off that plane was a master class in how to handle the DOJ.

Lawrence Necheles's avatar

Have faith. Our Judges are saving democracy along with us. Don’t forget, it was the Robert’s Court that upheld Obamacare.

Shane Yirak's avatar

I put my confidence behind people who have not let me down.

The court that has sided with Trump 21 out 23 shadow docket decisions is not one we can count on.

They must be impeached all 6 conservative justices.

With the remaining three on the bench and if a democrat congress blocks nominees we can reclaim SCOTUS there is no other option.

Even if it is a long shot

Lawrence Necheles's avatar

If one were to closely examine the “shadow docket” matters, what the court is saying is that it needs an actual “harmed” party. ie The matter needs to play out or the individual needs to be FIRED. Also, if the “aid” or funding was distributed, there would be it be a “case or controversy.” The matter wouldn’t be “justiciable.” It’s technical.

Melissa's avatar

Ah, but Shane! Are you not following the decisions of the amazing judges of the lower courts?

LyndsieCroft's avatar

One big issue to me is that, there can be a BIG gap of time, money and distress expended between when one could be arrested or detained, and when an act is deemed unconstitutional through the judicial process. We have already seen that strategy used in the Trump playbook to drum up fear.

This administration is already expanding the amount of facilities “detainees” can be held in. It’s not too far fetched to think they will be dual purposed for immigration and American dissenters.

Maria Inês's avatar

I am a Brazilian,

born in 1939.

I earned a Masters Degree from Indiana University in 1964 and a doctorate in Psychology from the University of São Paulo in 1968.

Since 1972, I have been a permanent resident of USA.

Being the proud grandmother of 6 US citizens I have many reasons to be grateful for the opportunities and for my life in this country.

Now I am especially grateful for the immense courage I perceive in citizens such as yourself.

Thank you Shane for upholding the BEST of your American heritage!

I know the vast majority of the American people share your views.

It is not surprising that many would be very scared.

I does take courage to acknowledge

and expose some historical documents containing sad truths.

Having lived through a military dictatorship in my country of origin which lasted 21 years - from 1964 through 1985 during which friends of mine were tortured and so many disappeared

I am scared too.

Thanks to Americans like yourself and to my fine children and grandchildren I have not lost hope.

Maria Inês Rocha Lacey

Joan St C.'s avatar

Thank you for sharing your story. It is a combination of the seniors leading the way because we have seen this before. There is more of us than there is of them. We will suffer but as Joe Biden said, we will build back better.

Explorer's avatar

Shane,

I read every word of this with a knot in my stomach and a fire in my heart. First, and most importantly: thank you. The courage it took to transmute a direct Layer 1 attack—getting fired for your principles—into the fuel for a full-time operation is a testament to your strength. You are the Master Salvager's Mandate made real.

Second, your analysis is not just a news report; it is a critical intelligence briefing for the entire rebellion. You have perfectly deconstructed the architecture of a new, more sophisticated COINTELPRO, a legal machine designed to criminalize dissent and weaponize "Economic Terror" against anyone who steps out of line.

What you've unearthed in NSPM-7 is a textbook schematic for how The Rust 🦠 builds its prisons.

* The vague, weaponized language ("Anti-Americanism," "anti-capitalism") is the blueprint for a new Layer 3 ⛓️ cage, designed to create a "Satanic Panic" where free speech itself is relabeled as a crime.

* The coordinated assault through the FBI, Treasury, and IRS is the enforcement mechanism of Layer 1 🧪, designed to hunt and financially cripple not just the dissenters, but anyone who dares to support them.

You've done the hard work of the Cartographer 🗺️, mapping the enemy's newest weapon. Now, our job is to get this intelligence to every Gear ⚙️ in the Phalanx. Consider this signal amplified. We are with you every step of the way.

Burn Bright.

Shane Yirak's avatar

Thank you my friend! All that evil needs to prevail is for good people to stand by and do nothing.

Melissa's avatar

lawfaremedia.org is worth a look. They characterize NSPM-7 thus: "weird mix of nonsense and menace" and "factual and legal gibberish."

john king (MY HUMBLE OPINION)'s avatar

Excellent explanation Shane. This should scare the crap out of people, which is the desired end goal of Trump's criminal regime. But what it should do beyond strike fear in peoples' hearts, is inject stubborn determination into their backbones, because if the resistance doesn't rise up and reject the edicts of the cowards in power, citizens will live and die under the oppressors' boots.

There is no judicial saviour in sight, as SCOTUS is proudly flying tyranny's flag. There may be some future hope of the calvary coming to the rescue, but by some accounts more than half the military are infected with the MAGA virus of racism and cruelty. The patriots that are true to their oath to the constitution will need to see a major escalation in public participation, before they tip their hand.

I'm weary of my repeating my same conclusion, but I see no other option to offer as advice. The public needs to shut the country down in a massive general strike. This is your damn country. It does not belong to the 1% who wish to dictate your future. It does not belong to the MAGA nihilists, who wish to tear it to pieces.

If you do not face the hardships of a strike soon, in hopes of ending this out of control regime, I guarantee you will face many years of more extreme hardships ahead.

Christina Gurchinoff's avatar

I don’t get a red flowery thing any more?

Robert Clyman's avatar

Isn’t it past time for the Democratic Party and the American people to ask the U.S. Armed Forces to intervene to stop this un-Constitutional fascist regime?

Nancy Werner Mosley's avatar

Thank you so much for laying out all the terms associated with this memo. I am using it as mature facts and “ammunition “ when speaking to my MAGA side of my immediate family. The MAGA side of my family, it’s almost impossible to have a civil conversation with any of them regarding anything happening within this present administration or even cultural context such as Charlie Kirk. As an example most feel every left leaning judgement in favor of the defendant being represented by the ACLU is just “awful and disgusting.” 🤦‍♀️

Clarity…. LWest's avatar

Trump’s Orders Targeting Anti-Fascism Aim to Criminalize Opposition

Purporting to go after “domestic terrorism,” the president presents an imagined left-wing conspiracy and authorizes punishments for even tenuous connections to speech the administration doesn’t like.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/trumps-orders-targeting-antifascism-aim-criminalize-opposition

Clarity…. LWest's avatar

10.16.2025 | NEWS

Jayapal, Pocan, Huffman Lead Letter to Trump Slamming Executive Order Targeting Protected Speech

https://jayapal.house.gov/2025/10/16/jayapal-pocan-huffman-lead-letter-to-trump-slamming-executive-order-targeting-protected-speech/

Christina Gurchinoff's avatar

Shit I’ve got a lot of catching up to do! I had a couple bad days and just tried keeping up with new faces and safe places! Glad to know all my people have gathered at Ethan’s space! I was thrilled to run into my community leaders already there. :)

Have hope! (())

Kathleen's avatar

Most of the actions, actors and coordination of these groups are actually originating from the White House. They are holding up a mirror.

Emanuel Pastreich's avatar

Thank you very much. I wonder whether I can interview you Shane for Center for Truth Politics about this issue

mark rubin's avatar

So why the hell isn't someone from the Dem legal corral running over to SCOTUS and demanding a shadow docket review of of WTF is going on here? Trump does it all the time and if Roberts isn't totally (we know he's partially in it) in the Repug Bag one would think he might be somewhat interested in the end of democracy. And why isn't this being broadcast on MSM? Oh that's right we don't control the media as does Trump.